Comment: will landlords really evict anti-social tenants in two weeks?

Kind of implies that tenants will be summarily evicted.

13
7313
rental market london

“Renters at risk under plans to let landlords evict tenants with two weeks notice,” says one headline.

Yes, it kind of implies that tenants will be summarily evicted, I thought so when I first read it. As the recent press reports would have us believe, but this is not going to be possible, given the way the system works at the moment…

The Government has announced a Plan to get tough on unruly tenants, to increase landlords’ rights to make it easier and quicker to evict anti-social tenants. Some press reports have even included damage to the property and rent arrears as part of the Plan.

But is this just a “sweetener” for landlords in view of the pending Renter’s Reform Bill, legislation that will hand out considerably more powers to tenants, and the big question is, how will it actually work out in practice?

The Plan

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s Anti-social Behaviour Action Plan unveiled last week has the laudable aim of cracking down on antisocial behaviour generally. It aims to “make sure anti-social behaviour is treated with the urgency it deserves,” and to roll out new “immediate justice” so that perpetrators can be made to “swiftly clean up their own mess, … giving communities more of a say over, and more visibility of, reparation.”

For landlords there are plans to introduce a new property ombudsman, reduce the notice period for all anti-social behaviour-related evictions to two weeks and presumably make it much easier to navigate the eviction process for troublesome tenants.

Repair the damage

The plan says that perpetrators will be made to repair the damage they inflicted on victims and communities, with the ambition of reparative work starting within 48 hours of them being given a disposal by the police. They will have to clean up graffiti and pick litter, even wash police cars, while wearing jumpsuits or high-vis vests, and under supervision of course.

Well, I’ll believe that when I see it!

With the increased incidence of self-reported acts of anti-social behaviour (as opposed a decline in police reported incidents), landlords and law-abiding tenants would clearly benefit from such stronger action by the police. And a change in the law, with real punitive systems to make sure that perpetrators are dealt with swiftly and effectively, would clearly be welcomed by everyone.

Yes, these changes would clearly be welcomed but forgive the cynicism; just how effective will these changes be? I want to be positive and I would like to think they will be very effective. But we all know, we’ve all heard the stories, and many of us have experienced it for ourselves, police action, police effectiveness, is not what was!

Landlord-tenant issues, even those bordering on the criminal, are invariably treated as civil matters, something the police are not generally interested in. As the police will tell you, they have a strict hierarchy of priorities: terrorism, knife and gun crime, sexual offending, domestic abuse and safeguarding vulnerable people from predatory behaviour.

I’m afraid that things like house breaking, vehicle theft and landlord-tenant issues (unless they involve violence) come way down on this list, and as the police constantly tell us themselves, as they claim, they just don’t have the resources.

Speed up the court system

“We will seek to halve the delay between a private landlords serving notice for anti-social behaviour and eviction and broaden the disruptive and harmful activities that can lead to eviction. We will also provide a clear expectation previous anti-social behaviour offenders are de-prioritised for social housing,” says the Plan.

But we all know, again, our slimed down county court system is overwhelmed, still recovering from the Covid pandemic backlog, generally it can take more than six months to evict a tenant, and that’s using Section 21, which is to be abolished.

Even a Parliament committee says that, “The Government risks undermining its own proposed tenancy reforms, include the banning of section 21 ‘no fault’ evictions, unless it fixes delays in the court system.”

This really does have the potential for the Government’s plans on rental reform to collapse into chaos!

A central pillar of Housing Secretary Michael Gove’s Renter’s Reform Bill is a plan to prevent unfair evictions. Without the Section 21 process this implies a test of fairness which involves a court hearing – a test of fairness in front of a county court judge, somewhat juxtaposing the Plan for speedy or summary evictions?

Who says its anti-social behaviour?

The Plan aims to speed up eviction times for perpetrators of anti-social behaviour but just how is this to be defined, surely this is open to wide wide interpretation. Will warnings be given first, if so how many, will the police really have the power to both enforce the law as well as meat out punishment?

A difficult process

Securing an eviction for anti-social behaviour has always been, up to now at least, a difficult process. The courts want good evidence and that’s often hard to gather. Police crime reports are helpful, as are witness statements from neighbours. But neighbours are often reluctant to help, even when it is happening to them, because of the fear of reprisals. They expect the landlord to intervene.

Success usually lies at the end of a long protracted process of keeping diary entries of incidents, collecting police reports and any witness reports you are lucky enough to get, going to court and convincing a judge – it can take months or even years!

The courts will always be careful about depriving tenants of a roof over their heads, they will err on the side of caution and resist evictions wherever possible, often simply giving warnings and a second chance.

Where would you draw the line?

Noisy tenants – and that’s probably the biggest cause of complaints – can drive neighbours and landlords to distraction. Having parties, playing loud music at in appropriate times as well as running washing machines overnight, or loud walking and banging from floors above, all constitute unreasonable and anti-social behaviour, but are they serious enough for summary eviction – somehow I doubt that.

The rules already exist for dealing with anti-social tenants and I can’t see that changing – it means going to court, so unless the behaviour is criminal and the police can deal with it quicker – don’t hold your breath – we’re stuck with what we already have.

Defining anti-social behaviour

To obtain an eviction you must show that the person’s behaviour is a “persistent pattern of anti-social behaviour,” generally falling into one of the following categories:

  • verbal abuse
  • harassment because of gender, race, disability or sexuality
  • violence or threats of violence
  • systematic bullying and/or intimidation
  • a pattern noise creation
  • dumping rubbish
  • vandalism, damage to property and graffiti.
  • Inappropriate parking
  • Not controlling pets

Persistent behaviour – therein lies the rub: one or two occasions may not constitute an issue, it must be occurring multiple times, but then the question of how often arises, and the seriousness of the event would also have to be taken into account. It’s a very complex issue not easily solved or dealt with quickly.

13 COMMENTS

  1. Other than a media re-working of the same contents from the Renters Reform Bill NOTHING has changed.

    The Bill refers to evicting tenants involved with SERIOUS anti-social behaviour.

    This Government HAS to go – I’m now willing to take my chances with Labour (and Ive voted Cons all my life)

    • I have read the details of the “evict in two weeks” at the end it says the tenant must have been convicted by a court of the ASBehaviour. How long does that take, months,nyears even, meanwhile the behaviour continued.
      This is totally unworkable, usual con job.

  2. This just hype. You will still have to have proof of ASB, you will still have to wait upwards of a year to go to court. If you succeed in Court (a big if probably) that’s when the two weeks’ notice will be given. If the tenant doesn’t go another couple of months to organise bailiffs will be needed. I assume that after a year has passed the court will want up to date evidence of ASB prior to the hearing, after all, the tenant could have reformed meantime and is now a model citizen after being threatened with homelessness. I think only conscience is now preventing many Landlords from evicting their good tenants and selling up. Certainly I don’t think many smaller landlords will rush to re-let as property becomes naturally vacant.

    • Absolutely correct. The two weeks will come after around a year of expensive effort. Expensive for the landlord, feckless tenants will get legal aid.

  3. i find it hard to see a case where a landlord will evict a tenant for asb that he has proved himself, its just not going to happen, and to be fair theres no real incentive as the asb wont actually be effecting the landlord directly. ill be more than happy to evict a tenant of mine whos engaged in asb so long as its been proven to me, my threshold of proof is on a par with a judges.

  4. I always find it appalling that the legal system prioritises racial, gender, sexual etc harassment above other types. Harassment is harassment, irrespective of the motivation. The law is inherently disparaging to minority groups, as well as discriminatory, especially to white male able bodied heterosexuals. The legal system establishes an unhealthy hierarchy of deemed inferiority. As for the central point here, the commentator is of course absolutely right.

  5. Govt is going for the low hanging fruit for a supposed easy win.

    It knows that ASB is a minor issue.

    It knows the major issue is with RENT DEFAULTING

    Most LL use S21 because the S8 process may be gamed by savvy feckless tenants.

    LL should be able to evictafter 45 days of rent defaulting WITHOUT any Court intervention.

    This 45 day period would include 2 months of rent default where rent is paid monthly in advance and a 14 day NTQ period.

    The LL then permitted to boot out the rent defaulting tenants on the 15th day providing the tenant DOESN’T pay the full outstanding rent in cleared funds.

    If they do then the LL wouldn’t be permitted to evict.
    Police assistance might be required when the LL eviction occurs to prevent a breach of the peace.

    But Govt doesn’t want a fast track eviction process for rent defaulting as it knows Councils would need to spend fortunes paying for TA for all the feckless rent defaulting tenants.

    ASB is just a distraction from the real issue of rent defaulting.

    Govt actions will continue to cause LL to sell up or move from long-term lettings.

    There really is no hope that the Tories will do the right thing.

    A new Labour Govt will be in charge soon.

    What Labour have planned for LL is far worse than the Tories.

    LL remain in the game at their peril.

    Many LL are giving up the unequal struggle and are leaving the long-term lettings sector.

  6. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/a-new-deal-for-renting-resetting-the-balance-of-rights-and-responsibilities-between-landlords-and-tenants/outcome/a-new-deal-for-renting-government-response

    “We will support communities facing anti-social behaviour by reducing notice periods in SERIOUS cases and reviewing the time taken for first possession hearings to be listed by the courts for these cases.”

    What is serious anti-social behaviour, who decides, how long does evidence gathering take – serious anti-social behaviour will require Police and Local Authority involvement and neither have the resources.

    Unless Landlords get off their backsides, come together and challenge this rubbish, then we deserve everything we have coming.

  7. I agree there is no help for landlord, everything is in favour of the tenant, If like us we are retired and have no other home, we have to find thousands of pounds to set the process going. Our tenant even sent the police to tell us we have not to go near our property. We gave him 6 months notice he waited till after the six months were over to tell us he wasn’t moving until he is thrown out. He has completely wrecked our property using it as a business address and storing dangerous hazardous liquid in the garage. We have tried to report him but nobody wants to know.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here